Wordle is Sort of Fun
My friend Juliana showed me Wordle the other day and I’ve sort of enjoyed playing around with it. I say “sort of” because it doesn’t exactly work the way I want.
With Wordle, you enter a URL (for your blog or your del.icio.us page or whatever) and it produces a word cloud that you can tweak. You can choose from a bunch of fonts, colors and layouts, making it fun to play with as you match your cloud to your mood or style. However, you can’t input different pages of a site or specific posts on your blog (or at least I can’t). It only chooses words from the most recent couple of posts on your home page, regardless of whether you enter a specific page or not.
This is annoying for me because sometimes I blog about things that are sort of random. (OK, I pretty much always do…) When I first tried Wordle, all my words had to do with my recent post about honey bees and ice cream, so I felt my Wordle cloud wasn’t all that representative of my blog or myself. And I like customized Web 2.0 toys to represent mah style, yo. Don’t you?
Anyway, here’s my current Wordle cloud anyway. Sort of fun, sort of whatever. Try it out.

You Know What? My Blog Isn’t a Conversation.
I’ve read a few interesting posts about this concept recently, and I want to give my two cents. My two cents being that my blog (not all blogs necessarily) just isn’t a conversation.
Here’s how it came out after marinating in my brain: a conversation isn’t me saying something and then people lining up to give me a response. And it’s not a kissing booth. A conversation is a real-time (or close to it) dialogue where information, ideas, views and opinions are shared back and forth. To me, that’s what a conversation is.
Online, conversations are happening on Twitter, FriendFeed, Seesmic, Google Talk, ooVoo (maybe even Plurk?)–the conversation is where people can speak and respond the way we do in real life. In snippets, with others chiming in and a mutual sense of engagement on both sides.
On my blog, you can leave a comment (I always appreciate your feedback), and I might respond to it, but that isn’t a conversation. That’s not how people talk to each other in real life. In a true conversation in real life, you don’t give your big spiel and then step aside so others can give their big spiel back. That’s not a conversation. That’s an announcement. At best it’s pseudo-conversation.
Don’t get me wrong, I think blogging is a valuable form of communication that allows for a sharing of ideas has fundamentally changed (for the better) the way we create and consume media content. I just don’t think it’s a conversation. For me, my blog is more like a bulletin of announcements that encourage responses. There’s a definite two-way flow of information and ideas here, but it’s a different type of communication that I consider separate from the concept of “conversation.”
What do you think? Is your blog a conversation?
Ridiculosity: The Philips Smart Handbag
My bud Brian Polensky pointed this techie handbag out to me, and I obviously had to share it here. If this thing ever becomes reality, someday I may be plugging my handbag into my laptop… Sexy.
|
Handbags, Brandbags: Louis Vuitton Gets Mugged, Doesn’t Support Darfur
I’ll take any chance I can get to blog about handbags. Sometimes I just make reasons up, but there’s actually an important conversation weaving through the Web right now about a famous French top-handle.
As it’s been discussed here, here, here and here, Louis Vuitton is suing 26 year-old Danish artist Nadia Plesner for using an image very similar to one of their monogram totes in an anti-genocide campaign to support Darfur. This is a tough one, buddies–there’s some cognitive dissonance going on here. I instinctively think first, “Eww, why is LV being so heartless and money-hungry about this? Darfur needs our help, and instead of freaking out, they could be finding a way to meaningfully contribute to the cause, even if they were dragged into it.” But at the same time, my instincts say, “I see where your head’s at, LV. Protect your brand–you go and take her down for clearly exploiting your image.” I admit, I love luxury handbags, but my gut ultimately goes with my first response.
The image on Nadia’s “Simple Living” t-shirt and poster (a jab at Paris Hilton’s reality show The Simple Life), pictured at the right, depicts a naked African child holding a Tinkerbell-like chihuahua and what is very obviously her take on a white/monogram multicolore Louis Vuitton handbag. Her description of the illustration reads (eloquently unedited):
My illustration Simple Living is an idea inspired by the medias constant cover of completely meaningless things. My thought was: Since doing nothing but wearing designerbags and small ugly dogs appearantly is enough to get you on a magasine cover, maybe it is worth a try for people who actually deserves and needs attention.
Without this glaringly negative comment, perhaps Louis Vuitton wouldn’t have gotten so bent out of shape over the image. But, I can see why they did. She’s essentially equating the LV brand (and chihuahuas?) with meaninglessness and media whoredom–not the prettiest epithets.
On Nadia’s site, there are plenty of supporters telling her to keep fighting the lawsuit and to continue standing up for herself because ultimately, her goal is a good one. And, it really is. One hundred percent of the money she makes from t-shirt sales goes to the Divest for Darfur fund.
So, does the end justify the means? Maybe.
I think Louis Vuitton, although perhaps within their rights, should have approached this differently. Yeah, at this point it looks like LV essentially got mugged and someone ran off with their handbag. However, with a different approach this could have been brand sharing instead of brand stealing. Like letting a friend borrow your bag because it went perfectly with her outfit. It’s still yours, but you’ll let her use it because in the end, everyone looks hot.
I wish Louis Vuitton had proactively done something to counter Nadia’s negative picture of the brand. Had they publicly shown where they’ve been a socially responsible company or, even better, struck a deal with her to donate a “meaningful” amount of money to her campaign, they may have avoided some of this media messiness. Given all the legal fees, taking that money and donating it to Darfur would probably have cost the company less and resulted in good press.
Louis Vuitton also could have created a place for people to talk about the situation to engage their various publics in a conversation about luxury brands, genocide, charity and anything in between. Just throwing out a lawsuit in this situation really wasn’t the sexiest choice. I think it’ll be hard for LV to rally support on this one. Either they’ll lose (which seems to be the more likely outcome) and be the brand that wanted to sue the girl trying to save Darfur, or they’ll win and be the brand that sued the girl trying to save Darfur. When the health and integrity of the brand is the important issue here, I think dropping the suit and redirecting their energy in a more helpful way would serve Louis Vuitton better in the long term.
I know this isn’t exactly breaking news, but what do you think? Is Louis Vuitton going overboard? Are they right on target? Should chihuahua breeders sue Nadia Plesner, too? If you have any takeaway thoughts, I’d love to see some reactions, ideas or new solutions in the comments section.
In other news, I got a new handbag today. And no, it’s not a Louis Vuitton. (It’s Burberry, *sigh, so pretty.*) Watch for a Today’s Honey post with a photo or two. You know you can’t wait. And don’t even think about mugging me. You think a lawsuit is bad? I’ll cut you.
Greg Verdino Shares Seana Mulcahy’s Musings on “Brand Loozrs”
I think Seana succinctly gets to the heart of a widespread issue that marketers and PR people are facing right now. It truly is not enough to use a tool just because it’s available and people are saying it’s the next big thing. Put the tool in the context of your brand, find out why it can work and make it work for you in a meaningful way. Thanks to Seana for a great post and to Greg for sharing her gems.
|
Live and Die By Calendars and Clocks
How much of your life do you plan (script, edit, choreograph, scheme…), and how much of it do you just let happen?

Can adults afford to be spontaneous?
I Would Have Failed College…
When people get scared and confused, they do some crazy ish sometimes. If I had a professor who banned her students from using Google or Wikipedia as sources of information or avenues for research, I would have dropped the class, no question. She’s have horrible ratings on ratemyprofessor.com and I doubt that many students would sign up for her class in the future.
So, I’m glad I didn’t go to this school or have this professor, because I would have failed. Big time. I’m that girl who went to the library twice throughout my entire stint in college. Come on, profs- embrace reality.
|
Facebook Ads Love You and Your Interests
From a user’s perspective, I don’t like it. From a developer’s perspective, this is smart. Facebook has never been one to let someone else blaze a trail…
Facebook users, what do you think?
|
Computers > Peace and Happiness
Well, of course. You can’t blog and share photos on a “peace and happiness.” Mom and Dad, if you’re reading, a shiny new MacBook wouldn’t be a bad gift…
In all seriousness, I’m looking forward to a post-holiday roundup to see how this all pans out. In the meantime, what are you asking for?
|
MySpace: A Place to Learn New Languages
My brother has a hobby of teaching himself to speak different languages. When we lived at home, if he was bored, he would go buy a book about speaking Polish or Chinese or German… Now that he’s a student at an Ivy League university, he’s taking time each semester to take classes on a new language. This semester he’s learning Portuguese. If he wanted to, I think my brother could have more MySpace friends than Tila Tequila.
I have a question, though. Does friendship mean the same thing in every language and culture represented in the MySpace community? If not, is MySpace really just a collection of smaller social, more culture-specific networks, or can we truly continue look at it as the social behemoth it seems to be? I’ll ask my brother- in English…
|




